Instrumente zur Messung von jugendlicher Mediennutzung
Heft 60 , Zeitgemässe Methoden der Kinder- und Jugendmedienforschung
Heft 60

Instrumente zur Messung von jugendlicher Mediennutzung
Ein Vergleich von App- und Web-basierten Mobile Experience Sampling-Tools

Zeitgemässe Methoden der Kinder- und Jugendmedienforschung
https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/60/2024.04.25.X
Veröffentlicht 2024-04-25
Sophie Mayen
University of Vienna image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4493-4716
Anne Reinhardt
University of Vienna image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5231-0877
Claudia Wilhelm
University of Vienna image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8178-1560
PDF (English)
Cover:: Sophie Mayen, Anne Reinhardt , Claudia Wilhelm: Instrumente zur Messung von jugendlicher Mediennutzung: Ein Vergleich von App- und Web-basierten Mobile Experience Sampling-Tools
PDF (English)

Schlagworte

Jugendliche
Digitale Medien
Mobile Experience Sampling
Methoden

Zitationsvorschlag

Mayen, Sophie, Anne Reinhardt, und Claudia Wilhelm. 2024. „Instrumente Zur Messung Von Jugendlicher Mediennutzung: Ein Vergleich Von App- Und Web-Basierten Mobile Experience Sampling-Tools“. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung 60 (Kinder und Jugendmedienforschung): 93-119. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/60/2024.04.25.X.
APA Chicago Harvard

Bibliografische Angaben herunterladen

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Lizenz

Copyright (c) 2024 Sophie Mayen, Anne Reinhardt , Claudia Wilhelm

Creative-Commons-Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.

Abstract

Im Zusammenhang mit dem zunehmenden Engagement von Jugendlichen mit digitalen Medien wird die genaue Messung ihrer Nutzung erschwert. Diese Komplexität ergibt sich aus Faktoren wie dem verstärkten Multitasking, der kürzeren Aufmerksamkeitsspanne und dem Einfluss von Gleichaltrigen. Eine Alternative zu herkömmlichen Verfahren der digitalen Medienforschung bietet das Mobile Experience Sampling (MES) mit dem Vorteil, Mediennutzung «in situ» mehrmals täglich und über einen längeren Zeitraum zu messen. Es fehlt jedoch Forschung dazu, wie MES-Studien bei Teenagern konzipiert sein sollten und welche spezifischen MES-Tools verwendet werden sollten, um hohe Rücklaufquoten zu gewährleisten. Mittels einer Mehrmethodenstudie, bestehend aus einer einwöchigen experimentellen MES-Befragung sowie qualitativen Interviews mit österreichischen Schüler:innen (N = 34) vergleicht dieser Artikel die Datenqualität (d. h. Antwortrate und Antwortverzögerung) und wahrgenommene Benutzerfreundlichkeit eines Web- und eines App-basierten MES-Tools. Im MES-Teil erhielten die Teilnehmenden an drei Tagen je drei Benachrichtigungen (NMES = 306), die sie zu einer kurzen Umfrage über die Zeitverwendung in den letzten 60 Minuten führte. Die qualitativen Interviews zeigen, dass die Jugendlichen beide Modi in Bezug auf ihre Bedienbarkeit (mit Ausnahme der Installation) ähnlich positiv wahrnahmen. Die Ergebnisse der MES-Daten weisen jedoch auf deutliche Unterschiede in der Datenqualität hin: Der Web-Modus generierte höhere Rücklaufquoten und war weniger fehleranfällig als der App-Modus, zum Beispiel für Antwortverzögerungen aufgrund technischer Probleme. Die Befunde bieten eine Hilfestellung für die Planung von MES-Studien und zeigen methodische Anknüpfungspunkte für zukünftige Forschungsarbeiten auf.

https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/60/2024.04.25.X

Literatur

Anghelcev, George, Sela Sar, Justin D. Martin, and Jas L. Moultrie. 2021. “Binge-Watching Serial Video Content: Exploring the Subjective Phenomenology of the Binge-Watching Experience”. Mass Communication & Society 24 (1): 130–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1811346.

Bauman, Adrian, Michael Bittman, and Jonathan Gershuny. 2019. “A Short History of Time Use Research; Implications for Public Health”. BMC Public Health 19 (S2): 607. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6760-y.

Berkel, Niels van, Denzil Ferreira, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2018. “The Experience Sampling Method on Mobile Devices”. ACM Computing Surveys 50 (6): 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123988.

Berkel, Niels van, Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2017. “Gamification of Mobile Experience Sampling Improves Data Quality and Quantity”. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1 (3): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130972.

Beyens, Ine, J. Loes Pouwels, Irene I. van Driel, Loes Keijsers, and Patti M. Valkenburg. 2020. “The Effect of Social Media on Well-Being Differs from Adolescent to Adolescent”. Scientific Reports 10 (1): 10763. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67727-7.

Botterill, Jacqueline, Marian Bredin, and Tim Dun. 2015. “Millennials’ Media Use: It Is A Matter Of Time”. Canadian Journal of Communication 40 (3). https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2015v40n3a2884.

Browne, Dillon Thomas, Shealyn S. May, Laura Colucci, Pamela Hurst-Della Pietra, Dimitri Christakis, Tracy Asamoah, Lauren Hale, et al. 2021. “From Screen Time to the Digital Level of Analysis: A Scoping Review of Measures for Digital Media Use in Children and Adolescents”. BMJ Open 11 (5): e046367. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046367.

Chatzitheochari, Stella, Kimberly Fisher, Emily Gilbert, Lisa Calderwood, Tom Huskinson, Andrew Cleary, and Jonathan Gershuny. 2018. “Using New Technologies for Time Diary Data Collection: Instrument Design and Data Quality Findings from a Mixed-Mode Pilot Survey”. Social Indicators Research 137 (1): 379–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1569-5.

Courvoisier, Delphine S., Michael Eid, and Tanja Lischetzke. 2012. “Compliance to a Cell Phone-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Study: The Effect of Time and Personality Characteristics”. Psychological Assessment 24 (3): 713–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026733.

Dias, Patrícia, and Rita Brito. 2021. “Criteria for Selecting Apps: Debating the Perceptions of Young Children, Parents and Industry Stakeholders”. Computers & Education 165 (May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104134.

Dollman, James, Anthony D. Okely, Louise Hardy, Anna Timperio, Jo Salmon, and Andrew P. Hills. 2009. “A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Assessing Young People’s Physical Activity: Deciding What Method to Use”. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 12 (5): 518–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2008.09.007.

Ethica Data Services, Inc. 2022. Ethica. iOS. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ethica/id1137173052.

Gansner, Meredith, Melanie Nisenson, Nicholas Carson, and John Torous. 2020. “A Pilot Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment via Smartphone Application to Identify Adolescent Problematic Internet Use”. Psychiatry Research 293 (November): 113428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113428.

Hepp, Andreas, Wiebke Loosen, and Uwe Hasebrink. 2021. “Jenseits des Computational Turn: Methodenentwicklung und Forschungssoftware in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft – zur Einführung in das Themenheft”. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 69 (1): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2021-1-3-1.

Heuvel, Marion I. van den, Anne Bülow, Vera E. Heininga, Elisabeth L. de Moor, Loes H. C. Janssen, Mariek Vanden Abeele, and Myrthe G. B. M. Boekhorst. 2021. “Tracking Infant Development With a Smartphone: A Practical Guide to the Experience Sampling Method”. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (December): 703743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703743.

Karsay, Kathrin, Jörg Matthes, Desirée Schmuck, and Sarah Ecklebe. 2023. “Messaging, Posting, and Browsing: A Mobile Experience Sampling Study Investigating Youth’s Social Media Use, Affective Well-Being, and Loneliness”. Social Science Computer Review 41 (4): 1493–1513. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211058308.

Kovalchik, Stephanie A., Steven C. Martino, Rebecca L. Collins, William G. Shadel, Elizabeth J. D’Amico, and Kirsten Becker. 2018. “Scaled Inverse Probability Weighting: A Method to Assess Potential Bias Due to Event Nonreporting in Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies”. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 43 (3): 354–81. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998617738241.

Larson, Reed and Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1983. “The Experience Sampling Method” New Directions for Methodology of Social & Behavioral Science (15): 41–56.

Lau, Wilfred W.F. 2017. “Effects of Social Media Usage and Social Media Multitasking on the Academic Performance of University Students”. Computers in Human Behavior 68 (March): 286–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.043.

Mallan, Kerry M., Parlo Singh, and Natasha Giardina. 2010. “The Challenges of Participatory Research with ‘Tech-Savvy’ Youth”. Journal of Youth Studies 13 (2): 255–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260903295059.

Maramba, Inocencio, Arunangsu Chatterjee, and Craig Newman. 2019. “Methods of Usability Testing in the Development of eHealth Applications: A Scoping Review”. International Journal of Medical Informatics 126 (June): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018.

Martens, Hans, and Renee Hobbs. 2015. “How Media Literacy Supports Civic Engagement in a Digital Age”. Atlantic Journal of Communication 23 (2): 120–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2014.961636.

Meier, Adrian, Ine Beyens, Teun Siebers, J. Loes Pouwels, and Patti M. Valkenburg. 2023. “Habitual Social Media and Smartphone Use Are Linked to Task Delay for Some, but Not All, Adolescents”. Edited by Scott Campbell. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 28 (3): zmad008. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad008.

Missen, Malik M. Saad, Amna Javed, Hina Asmat, Mariam Nosheen, Mickaël Coustaty, Nadeem Salamat, and V. B. Surya Prasath. 2019. “Systematic Review and Usability Evaluation of Writing Mobile Apps for Children”. New Review of Hypermedia & Multimedia 25 (3): 137–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2019.1677787.

Moreno, Megan A., Lauren Jelenchick, Rosalind Koff, Jens Eikoff, Cheryl Diermyer, and Dimitri A. Christakis. 2012. “Internet Use and Multitasking among Older Adolescents: An Experience Sampling Approach”. Computers in Human Behavior 28 (4): 1097–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.016.

mpfs. 2021. “JIM Studie 2021. Jugend, Information, Medien [JIM Study 2021. Youth, Information, Media]”. Stuttgart: Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest. https://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2021/JIM-Studie_2021_barrierefrei.pdf.

Naab, Teresa K., Veronika Karnowski, and Daniela Schlütz. 2019. “Reporting Mobile Social Media Use: How Survey and Experience Sampling Measures Differ”. Communication Methods and Measures 13 (2): 126–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1555799.

Orben, Amy, and Andrew K. Przybylski. 2019. “Screens, Teens, and Psychological Well-Being: Evidence from Three Time-Use-Diary Studies”. Psychological Science 30 (5): 682–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619830329.

Parry, Douglas A., Brittany I. Davidson, Craig J. R. Sewall, Jacob T. Fisher, Hannah Mieczkowski, and Daniel S. Quintana. 2021. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Discrepancies between Logged and Self-Reported Digital Media Use”. Nature Human Behaviour, (May). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01117-5.

Reinhardt, Anne, Sophie Mayen, and Claudia Wilhelm. 2024. “Uncovering the Missing Pieces: Predictors of Nonresponse in a Mobile Experience Sampling Study on Media Effects Among Youth”. Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393241235182.

Ribanszki, Robert, Jose A. S. Fonseca, Joseph M. Barnby, Kimberly Jano, Fatima Osmani, Soma Almasi, and Elias Tsakanikos. 2021. “Preferences for Digital Smartphone Mental Health Apps Among Adolescents: Qualitative Interview Study”. JMIR Formative Research 5 (8): e14004. https://doi.org/10.2196/14004.

Rich, Michael, David S. Bickham, and Lydia A. Shrier. 2015. “Measuring Youth Media Exposure: A Multimodal Method for Investigating the Influence of Media on Digital Natives”. American Behavioral Scientist 59 (14): 1736–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215596558.

Rintala, Aki, Martien Wampers, Inez Myin-Germeys, and Wolfgang Viechtbauer. 2020. “Momentary Predictors of Compliance in Studies Using the Experience Sampling Method”. Psychiatry Research 286 (April): 112896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112896.

Roekel, Eeske, Loes Keijsers, and Joanne M. Chung. 2019. “A Review of Current Ambulatory Assessment Studies in Adolescent Samples and Practical Recommendations”. Journal of Research on Adolescence 29 (3): 560–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12471.

Sawyer, Susan M., Peter S. Azzopardi, Dakshitha Wickremarathne, and George C. Patton. 2018. “The Age of Adolescence”. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health 2 (3): 223–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1.

Scharkow, Michael. 2016. “The Accuracy of Self-Reported Internet Use – A Validation Study Using Client Log Data”. Communication Methods and Measures 10 (1): 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446.

Scharkow, Michael. 2019. “The Reliability and Temporal Stability of Self-Reported Media Exposure: A Meta-Analysis”. Communication Methods and Measures 13 (3): 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1594742.

Scherer, Helmut, and Teresa K. Naab. 2013. “Messen im Zeitverlauf”. In Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft, edited by Wiebke Möhring and Daniela Schlütz, 103–23. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18776-1_6.

Schnauber-Stockmann, Anna, and Veronika Karnowski. 2020. “Mobile Devices as Tools for Media and Communication Research: A Scoping Review on Collecting Self-Report Data in Repeated Measurement Designs”. Communication Methods and Measures 14 (3): 145–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1784402.

Siebers, Teun, Ine Beyens, J. Loes Pouwels, and Patti M. Valkenburg. 2021. “Social Media and Distraction: An Experience Sampling Study among Adolescents”. Media Psychology, (August), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2021.1959350.

Stone, Arthur A., Stefan Schneider, and Joshua M. Smyth. 2023. “Evaluation of Pressing Issues in Ecological Momentary Assessment”. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 19 (1):107–131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080921-083128.

Sun, Jessie, Mijke Rhemtulla, and Simine Vazire. 2021. “Eavesdropping on Missing Data: What Are University Students Doing When They Miss Experience Sampling Reports?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 47 (11): 1535–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220964639.

Thulin, Eva, and Bertil Vilhelmson. 2019. “More at Home, More Alone? Youth, Digital Media and the Everyday Use of Time and Space”. Geoforum 100 (March): 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.010.

Tuten, Tracy L., David J. Urban, and Michael Bosnjak. 2002. “Internet Surveys and Data Quality: A Review”. In Online Social Sciences., 7–26. Ashland: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

Twenge, Jean M., Gabrielle N. Martin, and Brian H. Spitzberg. 2019. “Trends in U.S. Adolescents’ Media Use, 1976–2016: The Rise of Digital Media, the Decline of TV, and the (near) Demise of Print”. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 8 (4): 329–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000203.

Vachon, Hugo, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Aki Rintala, and Inez Myin-Germeys. 2019. “Compliance and Retention with the Experience Sampling Method Over the Continuum of Severe Mental Disorders: Meta-Analysis and Recommendations”. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21 (12): e14475. https://doi.org/10.2196/14475.

Valkenburg, Patti M., Ine Beyens, J. Loes Pouwels, Irene I. van Driel, and Loes Keijsers. 2021. “Social Media Browsing and Adolescent Well-Being: Challenging the ‘Passive Social Media Use Hypothesis.’” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, (October), zmab015. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab015.

Vandewater, Elizabeth A., and Sook-Jung Lee. 2009. “Measuring Children’s Media Use in the Digital Age: Issues and Challenges”. American Behavioral Scientist 52 (8): 1152–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209331539.

Verbeij, Tim, J. Loes Pouwels, Ine Beyens, and Patti M. Valkenburg. 2021. “The Accuracy and Validity of Self-Reported Social Media Use Measures among Adolescents”. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 3 (January): 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100090.

Viechtbauer, Wolfgang. 2022. “Structuring, Checking, and Preparing ESM Data”. In The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to Designing, Conducting, and Analyzing ESM Studies, 2nd ed., 137–52. Center for Research on Experience Sampling and Ambulatory Methods Leuven: REAL book. https://www.kuleuven.be/samenwerking/real/real-book.

Wen, Cheng K. Fred, Stefan Schneider, Arthur A. Stone, and Donna Spruijt-Metz. 2017. “Compliance with Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment Protocols in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19 (4): e132. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6641.

Westlund, Oscar, and Lennart Weibull. 2013. “Generation, Life Course and News Media Use in Sweden 1986–2011”. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook 11 (1): 147–73. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.11.1.147_1.