Conclusions: Media-related Educational Competencies of German and US Preservice Teachers
PDF

Keywords

Competency Modeling
Competency Measurement
Competency Advancement
International Comparison
Medienpädagogische Kompetenz
Digital Pedagogical Competencies

How to Cite

Tiede, Jennifer. 2020. “Conclusions: Media-Related Educational Competencies of German and US Preservice Teachers”. MediaEducation: Journal for Theory and Practice of Media Education, no. Media-related Edu. Competencies (July): 221-35. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/diss.jt/2020.07.04.X.

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Jennifer Tiede

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In the previous three main parts, the dimensions of modeling, measuring and advancing media-related educational competencies were analyzed in detail. Against this background, it has now become evident how closely interrelated the three dimensions are. The fourth research question addresses this issue: “What is the relationship between modeling, measuring and advancing media-related educational competencies in both countries?” Hence, the following final chapter will bring together and draw conclusions on the findings presented above and conclude the work with an overall summary and analysis of the relationships between modeling, measuring and advancing media-related educational competencies and with an outlook to further perspectives and research desiderata.

https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/diss.jt/2020.07.04.X

References

Archambault, L. M., and J. H. Barnett. 2010. “Revisiting Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Exploring the TPACK Framework.” Computers & Education 55 (4): 1656–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009.

Bertelsmann Stiftung, CHE Centrum für Hochschulentwicklung gGmbH, Deutsche Telekom Stiftung, and Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft, eds. 2018. Lehramtsstudium in Der Digitalen Welt – Professionelle Vorbereitung Auf Den Unterricht Mit Digitalen Medien?! Gütersloh, Germany: Monitor Lehrerbildung.

European Schoolnet [EUN]. 2019. “ITELab – Innovating ITE Curricula.” Brussels, Belgium. http://itelab.eun.org/.

Foulger, T., K. J. Graziano, D. A. Schmidt-Crawford, and D. A. Slykhuis. 2017. “Teacher Educator Technology Competencies.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 25 (4): 413–48.

Foulger, T., K. Wetzel, and R. R. Buss. 2019. “Moving Toward a Technology Infusion Approach: Considerations for Teacher Preparation Programs.” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 35 (2): 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1568325.

Kleiner, B., N. Thomas, N. Lewis, and B. Greene. 2007. “Educational Technology in Teacher Education Programs for Initial Licensure.” Statistical analysis report. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/ 2008040.pdf.

Lux, N. J., A. W. Bangert, and D. B. Whittier. 2011. “The Development of an Instrument to Assess Preservice Teacher’s Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 45 (4): 415–31. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.45.4.c.

Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004.